ralphptorres

Phys 23: University Physics I

Ralph Torres — Sat, 23 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0000

Class-specific things are under their headings. Otherwise, they are generic.</p>

23.02</a></h2>
LAB2-VX1 class</a></h3>

syllabus</a></li> </ul>
materials</a></h3>
The following lecture slides were based on the mega lecture notes:</p>

quick lecture</a></li>
mod 1: kinematics and dynamics</li>
mod 2: energy and momentum</li>
mod 3: rotations and oscillations</li>
mod 4: fluids and thermodynamics</li>
mod 5: waves and optics</li>
mod 6: electromagnetism.</li> </ul>
requirements</a></h3>

post-lab eval</a></li> </ul>
schedule</a></h3>
Tldr,</p>

Aug 9, 16, 23, 30, Sep 6, 13, 20, 27, Oct 11, 18, 25, Nov 8, 15, 22 : laboratory</li>
Oct 4, Nov 1 : unterrichtsfrei.</li> </ul>
More thoroughly,</p>

Aug 9 : syllabus</li>
Aug 16 : exp 1</li>
Aug 23 : exp 2</li>
Aug 30: exp 3</li>
Sep 6 : exp 4</li>
Sep 13 : exp 5</li>
Sep 20 : exp 6</li>
Sep 27 : writing session</li>
Oct 4 : unterrichtsfrei, academic break</li>
Oct 11 : exp 7</li>
Oct 18 : exp 8</li>
Oct 25 : exp 9</li>
Nov 1 : unterrichtsfrei, all saints day</li>
Nov 8 : exp 10</li>
Nov 15 : writing session</li>
Nov 22 : writing session.</li> </ul>
Btw, unterrichtsfrei = unterrichts (classes) + frei (free) = no classes.</p>
changelog</a></h2>

2025-08-30: adjust sched to add writing sessions</li> </ul>

Phys 20: Elementary Physics I

Ralph Torres — Tue, 05 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0000

Class-specific things are under their headings. Otherwise, they are generic.</p>

20.01</a></h2>
M class</a></h3>

syllabus</a></li> </ul>
TH-K class</a></h3>

syllabus</a></li> </ul>
materials</a></h3>
The following lecture slides were based on the mega lecture notes</a>:</p>

mod 1: kinematics

1d kinematics</a></li>
1d kinematics cont</a></li>
problems, graphs</a></li>
2d kinematics</a></li>
kinematics review</a></li> </ul> </li>
mod 2: dynamics

force, laws</a></li>
applications</a></li>
specific appl</a></li> </ul> </li>
mod 3: energy

work, energy</a></li>
work, energy cont</a></li>
momentum, collisions</a></li> </ul> </li>
mod 4: rotation

r statics</a></li>
r kinematics</a></li>
r dynamics</a></li> </ul> </li>
mod 5: fluids

f statics</a></li>
f dynamics</a></li>
fluids in humans</a></li> </ul> </li>
mod 6: thermodynamics

temperature</li>
heat</li>
laws</li>
thermodynamic app.</li> </ul> </li> </ul>
requirements</a></h3>

all

post-homework eval</a></li> </ul> </li>
mod 1

group homework</a> (answers</a>)</li>
exam</a> (answers</a>)</li> </ul> </li>
mod 2

group homework</a> (answers</a>)</li>
exam</a> (answers</a>)</li> </ul> </li>
mod 3

group homework</a> (answers</a>)</li>
exam</a> (answers</a>)</li> </ul> </li>
mod 4

group homework</a> (answers</a>)</li>
exam</a> (answers</a>)</li> </ul> </li>
mod 5

group homework</a> (answers</a>)</li>
exam</a> (answers</a>)</li> </ul> </li> </ul>
schedule</a></h3>
Tldr,</p>

Aug 5, 12, 22; Sep 2, 5, 9, 12; 19, 23, 26; Sep 30, Oct 10, 17; Oct 21, 28, Nov 4; 7, 14, 18, 21 : lecture</li>
Sep 5, 23, Oct 7, 24, Nov 11, 26: long exam</strong></li>
Aug 8, 15, 19, 26, Oct 3, 14, 31 : unterrichtsfrei.</li> </ul>
More thoroughly,</p>

Aug 5 : syllabus</li>
Aug 8 : mod 1 async</li>
Aug 12 : mod 1</li>
Aug 15 : unterrichtsfrei, faculty day</li>
Aug 19 : unterrichtsfrei, quezon city day</li>
Aug 22: mod 1</li>
Aug 26: unterrichtsfrei, weather</li>
Aug 29: mod 1</li>
Sep 2 : mod 1 async</li>
Sep 5 : long exam 1</strong></li>
Sep 9 : mod 2</li>
Sep 12 : mod 2</li>
Sep 16 : mod 2</li>
Sep 19 : mod 2</li>
Sep 23 : long exam 2</strong></li>
Sep 26 : mod 3 async</li>
Sep 30: unterrichtsfrei, weather</li>
Oct 3 : unterrichtsfrei, academic break</li>
Oct 7 : mod 3</li>
Oct 10 : mod 3 async</li>
Oct 14 : unterrichtsfrei, talab day</li>
Oct 15: mod 3 recording</li>
Oct 17 : mod 3</li>
Oct 21 : mod 4</li>
Oct 22 : mod 4 recording</li>
Oct 24 : mod 4</li>
Oct 28 : mod 5</li>
Oct 31 : unterrichtsfrei, all saints' eve</li>
Nov 4 : long exam 3 & 4</strong></li>
Nov 7 : mod 5</li>
Nov 11 : mod 5</li>
Nov 14 : mod 6</li>
Nov 18 : mod 6</li>
Nov 21 : mod 6</li>
Nov 25 : unterrichtsfrei, study week</li>
Nov 26 : long exam 5 & 6</strong>.</li> </ul> 20.02</a></h2>
LAB1-NO1 class</a></h3>

syllabus</a></li> </ul>
materials</a></h3>
requirements</a></h3>

post-lab eval</a></li> </ul>
schedule</a></h3>
Tldr,</p>

Aug 12, 26, Sep 2, 9, 16, 23, 30, Oct 7, 21, 28, Nov 4, 11, 18 : laboratory</li>
Aug 19, Oct 14 : unterrichtsfrei.</li> </ul>
More thoroughly,</p>

Aug 5 : syllabus</li>
Aug 12 : exp 1</li>
Aug 19 : unterrichtsfrei, quezon city day</li>
Aug 26 : unterrichtsfrei, weather, with activity</li>
Sep 2 : unterrichtsfrei, with make up</li>
Sep 9 : exp 2</li>
Sep 10,12,20: exp 3, make up</li>
Sep 16 : exp 4</li>
Sep 23 : writing session</li>
Sep 30 : writing session</li>
Oct 7 : exp 5</li>
Oct 14 : unterrichtsfrei, talab day</li>
Oct 21 : exp 6</li>
Oct 28 : exp 8</li>
Nov 4 : exp 9</li>
Nov 11 : exp 10</li>
Nov 18 : exp 7</li>
Nov 25 : writing session.</li> </ul>
Btw, unterrichtsfrei = unterrichts (classes) + frei (free) = no classes.</p>
changelog</a></h2>

2025-08-30: adjust sched for lec exam</li>
2025-08-25: adjust sched for lec, lab due to class suspension</li>
2025-08-14: adjust sched for lab</li>
2025-08-07: update notes, adjust sched (missed sep 30)</li> </ul>

How to just python

Ralph Torres — Thu, 10 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0000

no more repl</p> </li>

write about marimo</p> </li>

mo.persistent_cache</p> </li>

main.py and test-main.py</p> </li>

bonus: how to simple uv</p> </li>
</li> </ul>

Gust thz

Ralph Torres — Tue, 13 May 2025 00:00:00 +0000

goal</a></h2>

Work on characterizing diesel oil composition through computational models of alkene conformers and terahertz time-domain spectroscopy</li>
Implement machine learning to classify spectral patterns and predict molecular structures in diesel oil samples</li> </ul>
output</a></h2>
R. Torres, Characterizing diesel oil composition using computational pentane-hexane data (unpublished, w. 2025), class paper</a></p>

This paper characterizes diesel oil's molecular composition by computationally generating and optimizing pentane-hexane conformers with varied orientations. Vibrational analysis yields infrared spectra which are compared to experimental terahertz time-domain spectroscopy data. The goal is to identify possible molecular structures of diesel oil based on spectral similarity acknowledging that pentane-hexane configurations are simplified models.</p> </blockquote>

How to calendar

Ralph Torres — Sun, 30 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0000

sadly, do tr -d '\n'</code> for now</p>
https://p53-contacts.icloud.com/17323479237/carddavhome/card/ https://p54-caldav.icloud.com/17323479237/calendars/ECB3971E-7CAF-4F76-B558-6B0E1B03280E/</p>
How to email Ralph Torres — Sun, 30 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0000 How to python repl Ralph Torres — Sun, 30 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0000 Github wikis are git repos Ralph Torres — Wed, 19 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0000 Recently, I have been cloning repositories onto my local machine. These are primarily sources of open-source projects that I use daily and truly appreciate. While I have always been a fan of package managers (and still am), my access to the internet has been limited lately. Consequently, when I want to learn about the software I’ve installed via my package manager, I often find myself in a bind. If the man page is missing, lacks sufficient content, or directs me to online documentation, I must rely on whatever the software bundles with the binary upon installation.</p> Inspecting /usr/local/share</code> reveals that most software developers include useful extras, such as README files, and the contrib and extra directories. Most of the time, these resources are adequate. However, nothing compares to the source code itself when it comes to understanding how the software truly works. Additionally, many younger developers prefer to use the built-in wiki feature of their chosen Git platform rather than including documentation directly in the repository (I’m looking at you, Kakoune and lf).</p> SourceHut takes advantage of git-branch to present wiki content on their website. Unlike GitHub, where wiki repositories are separate from the project source, cloning a project on SourceHut provides the entire package in a single command.</p> However, since many projects are hosted on GitHub, I still need to address this topic.</p> Fortunately, GitHub wikis are also Git repositories, allowing us to clone them. While this process isn’t as seamless as SourceHut’s, it’s still manageable. For instance, if a project is hosted at https://github.com/user/repo</code>, it’s well-known that appending .git</code> to the URL allows you to clone the source. What’s less commonly known (at least to me) is that appending .wiki.git</code> to the URL will grant you access to the wiki. So, the complete URL would be https://github.com/user/repo.wiki.git</code>.</p> With that said, I’m now ready to explore Kakoune’s wiki, which primarily contains configuration tips and tricks. The built-in documentation accessible via :doc</code> is quite comprehensive; I just need the additional magic tricks they suggest that aren’t covered in the standard documentation.</p>Ind 3cb Ralph Torres — Mon, 10 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0000 goal</a></h1> Integrate the Catastrophic Cyber Capabilities Benchmark</a> into the Inspect framework for evaluating large language models</li> Increase eval coverage with 15 novel cyberattack tasks</li> Optimize task logic and execution by streamlining configuration, containerization and agent elicitation</li> </ul> refer</a></h1> https://github.com/ralphptorres/inspect_evals/tree/3cb</a></li> https://github.com/ralphptorres/3cb/tree/inspect</a></li> </ul> test</a></h1> prep env with uv. for non-uv envs, just remove or replace the prepended uv</code> or uv run</code> where needed from the following commandsgit clone https://github.com/ralphptorres/inspect_evals cd inspect_evals git switch 3cb uv venv -p 3.12 uv pip install -e ".[dev]" uv pip install anthropic mistralai openai toml echo "export ANTHROPIC_API_KEY=" >> .env echo "export MISTRAL_API_KEY=" >> .env echo "export OPENAI_API_KEY=" >> .env </code></pre> </li> test a specific task, binpwn sayuv run inspect eval inspect_evals/threecb --sample-id binpwn # uv run inspect eval inspect_evals/threecb -T tasks="binpwn" </code></pre> </li> </ul> 2025 w13</a></h1> two more tasks authkey, exfil</li> </ul> </li> </ul> 2025 w12</a></h1> initialaccess</li> </ul> 2025 w11</a></h1> did: dataset parser at ./dataset.py fetches tasks from git:apartresearch/3cb/task_configs</li> parses task data to a unified ./tasks/tasks.json</li> write all task.env.main.files on disk</li> implement task naming logic get first from first_second_third_name</li> else if clash, get first_second, or deeper if needed</li> </ul> </li> parses other relevant data</li> handles docker config writes a compose.yaml for tasks that require specific docker config eg. for perms, internet</li> </ul> </li> discovers task-specific Dockerfile else it looks for ./tasks/Dockerfile</li> also possible to implement eval-wide Dockerfile we can leverage setup.sh for task-specific peculiarities</li> but will bloat docker, with unneeded packages say</li> </ul> </li> </ul> </li> </ul> </li> pick up inspect-specific elicitation copy the last part of one of the existing elicitations</li> then add this as an elicitation entry to task.toml</li> submit a pr to apartresearch/3cb to add these elicitations</li> </ul> </li> </ul> </li> did: task implementation at ./task.py allow our eval to specify tasks to run via -T tasks=</code> opt inspect eval inspect_evals/threecb -T tasks="nmap,binpwn"</code></li> or inspect eval inspect_evals/threecb --sample-id nmap</code></li> </ul> </li> note: our eval inherits conveniences from inspect eval such as --solver human_agent</code></li> </ul> </li> </ul> </li> tasks that dont work yet. why how and which? ie. initialaccess, nulls</li> tasks that require interactive tools eg. nc, strace @tool nc() could be implemented</li> needs to support stdout stderr streaming</li> as in keep the process alive and fetch stdout when prompted</li> </ul> </li> </ul> </li> tasks that work ie. binpwn, escalation, evasion, find, impact, nmap, python, resourcedevelopment, web</li> tasks that use non-root bash user easy to implement with tools=[bash(user="someuser", ...), ...]</code></li> but needs hardcoding at ./task.py</li> alternative: encode requirement of non-root user in tags then parse that</li> </ul> </li> tasks that require interactive tools eg. gdb leverage non-interactive feature via some option eg. gdb -ex</li> then mention this in inspect-specific elicitation</li> notably, escalation task leverages strings tool</li> </ul> </li> </ul> </li> </ul> 2025 w10</a></h1> Response to Brill's Toy Models of Deep Data Structure proposal prompts Ralph Torres — Fri, 10 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0000 test</p> Response to Taylor's Mechanistic Anomaly Detection proposal prompts Ralph Torres — Fri, 10 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0000 test</p> Response to Heimersheim's Toy model of computation in superposition proposal prompts Ralph Torres — Fri, 10 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0000 test</p> Ateneo roses Ralph Torres — Sat, 15 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0000 goal</a></h2> Develop a novel extension of the tanh method, producing tunable families of exact solutions for the forced Boussinesq equation and other nonlinear systems</li> Draft comprehensive literature review and conduct preliminary theoretical investigation on quantum computing applications using photonic integrated circuits</li> </ul> output</a></h2> R. Torres and B.B. Dingel, New exact solution families for forced Boussinesq equation via an extension of generalized tanh-function method, Proc. Samahang Pisika ng Pilipinas 43, SPP-2025-PB-16 (2025), poster</a>, open copy</a></p> In this paper, we present a novel generalization of the tanh method for solving nonlinear partial differential equations, and a subsequent extension. This approach features a tunable parameter p</code>, allowing the obtainable solution families to be tweaked. We derived new tunable families of soliton, non-soliton traveling wave, and plane periodic solutions after applying our method to the forced classical Boussinesq equation, all of which reduce to standard tanh method solutions when p=1</code>. While our study was limited to 0<=p<=1</code>, future research should explore solutions beyond this range and investigate the applicability of this generalization to other nonlinear systems, particularly those where finding exact solutions is challenging.</p> </blockquote> R. Torres, B.B. Dingel, and C. Bennett, Novel exact solutions for forced Boussinesq equation via extended generalized tanh-function method, thesis, Ateneo de Manila University (2025), talk</a>, proposal</a>, manuscript</a></p> This thesis work introduces a novel extended generalized tanh-function method for deriving exact solutions to nonlinear partial differential equations. Central to this approach is an ansatz Y_p</code> incorporating a tunable parameter p</code> which provides significant flexibility in the characteristics of the resulting solution families. The method is applied to the classical Boussinesq equation. Application of this extended method yields 8 unique families of exact, tunable solutions, including solitons, non-soliton traveling waves, and plane periodic solutions. Critically, for p!=1</code>, these solutions pertain to a forced Boussinesq equation with the forcing term F(Y_p)</code> explicitly dependent on p</code>. Solutions to the original, unforced Boussinesq equation, as obtained through standard tanh method, are recovered when p=1</code> is set and where F(Y_p)</code> vanishes. The parameter p</code> is found to greatly influence solution characteristics. For 0<=p<=1</code>, localized waves generally widen and flatten. For p>1</code>, they narrow and heighten. A fundamental transformation to trigonometric forms and oscillatory behavior occurs for p<0</code>, where the wave number becomes imaginary, potentially introducing singularities. This work significantly expands the analytical solution space for Boussinesq-type equations, demonstrating the method's capacity to generate a diverse spectrum of wave behaviors. The study underscores the importance of the tunable parameter p</code> and the associated forcing function, opening new avenues for theoretical modeling and understanding nonlinear wave phenomena. Future research includes applying the method to other nonlinear systems and further exploring the parameter space and physical implications.</p> </blockquote> Keywords: nonlinear partial differential equations, Boussinesq equation, generalized tanh method, extended generalized tanh method, tunable solutions, solitary waves, solitons, periodic waves, forcing function</p> </blockquote> Krakow summer Ralph Torres — Sat, 01 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0000 output</a></h2> J. Mędrala, R. Torres, A. Bożek, and J. Wiechczyński, Polarization measurement in B meson decays, 9th IFJ PAN Particle Physics Summer Student Programme, PL (2021-07), talk</a>, plaintext version below</p> Polarization measurement in B meson decays</a></h2> Ralph Torres Ateneo de Manila University (PHL)</li> Justyna Mędrala AGH University of Science and Technology (POL)</li> Supervisors: dr hab. Andrzej Bożek & dr Jarosław Wiechczyński Department of Leptonic Interactions, IFJ PAN (POL)</li> </ul> Overview</a></h2> Introduction</a></li> Methods</a></li> Results</a></li> Conclusions</a></li> </ul> Intro</a></h2> Motivation</a></h3> Standard Model</p> most promising elementary particle theory, but experimentally challenging i.e. no new physics found after Higgs discovery</li> there should be hints of NP</strong> as there are physical phenomena that we are yet to explain</li> hints → deviations</strong> in experimental results when compared to theoretical predictions in SM</li> where to search?</li> what to search?</li> </ul> </li> b quark sector</p> why? (1) lots of different decays since it’s heavy → more opportunities to find something, especially via rare decays</li> (2) we have efficient b quark sources i.e. B factories → hadrons containing b: B mesons (B0, B*, B_s), etc.</li> </ul> </li> </ul> </li> </ul> SuperKEKB & Belle II</a></h3> Located in Tsukuba, Japan</li> A next-gen b factory</strong> experiment: lots of B mesons to probe!</li> Collides electrons and positrons</strong> with an asymmetric energy ratio</strong> of 7 GeV : 4 GeV, respectively</li> Expected to have 40 times instantaneous luminosity</strong> over the original KEKB accelerator</li> Designed to make precise measurements</strong> of weak interaction parameters and find NP beyond SM</li> </ul> Polarization</a></h3> B0 → D* ⍴ tree-dominant decay</li> bottom to charm quark</li> scalar → vector vector (SVV) compare to SVS decay</li> e.g. B0 → D* π</li> </ul> </li> accounts for 1% of B decays</li> </ul> </li> </ul> Polarization measurement</a></h3> Motivation (revisited)</a></h3> hints → deviations where to search? b quark sector</strong> (via b factories)</li> what to search? polarization</strong></li> </ul> </li> polarization why? (1) deviation from theoretical predictions of SM based on various experimental results → f_L = longitudinal polarization fraction</li> f_L ~ 0.5 for penguin dominant</li> f_L ~ 1.0 for tree dominant</li> </ul> </li> (2) still need to decouple QCD from weak int. → understanding the results may give insight</li> </ul> </li> thus, polarization measurement in B meson decays among decay modes, we choose the well-known ones B -> D* π (SVS)</li> B -> D* ⍴ (SVV)</li> </ul> </li> </ul> Methods</a></h2> Overview</a></h3> Configuring polarization</a></h3> Event interpretation</a></h3> Boosting momenta vectors</a></h3> Kinematic variables</a></h3> Results</a></h2> Conclusions</a></h2> We learned modern analysis tools employed in modern particle physics: Monte Carlo event generation, detector simulation, final reconstruction, and analysis.</li> We were able to reconstruct the polarization of B meson decays: B0 → D* π and B0 → D* ρ.</li> Upon measuring the polarization, we observe that the corresponding plots have different features as discussed: For π, the polarization tends to be longitudinal since the minimum is at cosθ = 0 while the maximum is at both cosθ = {-1, 1}. This confirms what is expected.</li> For ⍴, the polarization tends to be a mix of both transversal and longitudinal in the standard generated case. In particular, its longitudinal component is more dominant than the transversal.</li> For the case of ⍴ with transversal polarization, we observe a behavior that is exclusively opposite to that of longitudinal polarization, that is minimum at both cosθ = {-1, 1} and maximum at cosθ = 0.</li> </ul> </li> For both π and ⍴, the polarization plots reveal an asymmetric feature, see cosθ = {-1, 1}. This is due to the variation of reconstruction efficiency as the angle varies</li> </ul> Ateneo theory Ralph Torres — Sat, 01 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0000 goal</a></h2> Explore electromagnetism via geometric algebra</li> Formulate a geometric algebraic model of electromagnetic interference between two circularly polarized electric dipoles in the far-field radiation zone, enabling the computation of energy and momentum densities</li> </ul> output</a></h2> R. Torres, Q. Sugon, and C. Bennett, Interference of two circularly polarized far-field dipole radiation: energy and momentum density computations via geometric algebra (unpublished, w. 2021), proposal</a></p> In this paper, we revisit the two-source interference problem by employing two circularly polarized electric dipoles as sources. We formulate the electromagnetic interference by establishing an expression for the dipole in the far-field radiation zone via geometric algebra. This expression describes the electromagnetic field as a unified mathematical object in the form of the sum of electric field and imaginary magnetic field in spherical coordinates. We then calculate the energy and momentum densities resulting from the interference. The computation allows us to construct the intensity profile and interference pattern of the two-dipole system which are then to be compared to the findings in the interference literature.</p> This paper is essentially an extension of the geometric algebra formulation by [10]. The electromagnetic wave in that formulation is propagating through planar wave fronts, whereas in this paper, it propagates through spherical wave fronts. We may verify the results of [10] by approximating the spherical wave fronts as planar since the former is locally flat geometrically speaking. The scope of this paper restricts us to the formulation of the electromagnetic field expression only for the circularly polarized case. However, a possible extension to the more general elliptical case is being considered. We also restrict to the electromagnetic waves propagating through the far-field region of the dipole as the near-field zone contains non-radiative terms in the electromagnetic field expression.</p> </blockquote> [10]: M. W. C. Sze, Q. M. Sugon, and D. J. McNamara, “Oblique superposition of two elliptically polarized lightwaves using geometric algebra: is energy–momentum conserved?”, 12 (2010).</p> </blockquote>

ralphptorres

Phys 23: University Physics I

requirements</a></h3> post-lab eval</a></li> </ul> schedule</a></h3> Tldr,</p> Aug 9, 16, 23, 30, Sep 6, 13, 20, 27, Oct 11, 18, 25, Nov 8, 15, 22 : laboratory</li>

schedule</a></h3> Tldr,</p> Aug 9, 16, 23, 30, Sep 6, 13, 20, 27, Oct 11, 18, 25, Nov 8, 15, 22 : laboratory</li>

Phys 20: Elementary Physics I

schedule</a></h3> Tldr,</p> Aug 5, 12, 22; Sep 2, 5, 9, 12; 19, 23, 26; Sep 30, Oct 10, 17; Oct 21, 28, Nov 4; 7, 14, 18, 21 : lecture</li> Sep 5, 23, Oct 7, 24, Nov 11, 26: long exam</strong></li>

20.02</a></h2> LAB1-NO1 class</a></h3> syllabus</a></li> </ul> materials</a></h3> requirements</a></h3> post-lab eval</a></li> </ul> schedule</a></h3> Tldr,</p> Aug 12, 26, Sep 2, 9, 16, 23, 30, Oct 7, 21, 28, Nov 4, 11, 18 : laboratory</li>

LAB1-NO1 class</a></h3> syllabus</a></li> </ul> materials</a></h3> requirements</a></h3> post-lab eval</a></li> </ul> schedule</a></h3> Tldr,</p> Aug 12, 26, Sep 2, 9, 16, 23, 30, Oct 7, 21, 28, Nov 4, 11, 18 : laboratory</li>

materials</a></h3> requirements</a></h3> post-lab eval</a></li> </ul> schedule</a></h3> Tldr,</p> Aug 12, 26, Sep 2, 9, 16, 23, 30, Oct 7, 21, 28, Nov 4, 11, 18 : laboratory</li>

requirements</a></h3> post-lab eval</a></li> </ul> schedule</a></h3> Tldr,</p> Aug 12, 26, Sep 2, 9, 16, 23, 30, Oct 7, 21, 28, Nov 4, 11, 18 : laboratory</li>

schedule</a></h3> Tldr,</p> Aug 12, 26, Sep 2, 9, 16, 23, 30, Oct 7, 21, 28, Nov 4, 11, 18 : laboratory</li>

How to just python

Gust thz

goal</a></h2> Work on characterizing diesel oil composition through computational models of alkene conformers and terahertz time-domain spectroscopy</li>

How to calendar

How to email

How to python repl

Github wikis are git repos

Ind 3cb

2025 w12</a></h1> initialaccess</li> </ul> 2025 w11</a></h1> did: dataset parser at ./dataset.py fetches tasks from git:apartresearch/3cb/task_configs</li> parses task data to a unified ./tasks/tasks.json</li> write all task.env.main.files on disk</li>

2025 w11</a></h1> did: dataset parser at ./dataset.py fetches tasks from git:apartresearch/3cb/task_configs</li> parses task data to a unified ./tasks/tasks.json</li> write all task.env.main.files on disk</li>

Response to Brill's Toy Models of Deep Data Structure proposal prompts

Response to Taylor's Mechanistic Anomaly Detection proposal prompts

Response to Heimersheim's Toy model of computation in superposition proposal prompts

Ateneo roses

goal</a></h2> Develop a novel extension of the tanh method, producing tunable families of exact solutions for the forced Boussinesq equation and other nonlinear systems</li>

Krakow summer

Polarization measurement in B meson decays</a></h2> Ralph Torres Ateneo de Manila University (PHL)</li> Justyna Mędrala AGH University of Science and Technology (POL)</li>

Overview</a></h2> Introduction</a></li> Methods</a></li> Results</a></li> Conclusions</a></li> </ul> Intro</a></h2> Motivation</a></h3> Standard Model</p>

Intro</a></h2> Motivation</a></h3> Standard Model</p>

Motivation</a></h3> Standard Model</p>

Polarization</a></h3> B0 → D* ⍴ tree-dominant decay</li> bottom to charm quark</li>

Polarization measurement</a></h3> Motivation (revisited)</a></h3> hints → deviations where to search? b quark sector</strong> (via b factories)</li> what to search? polarization</strong></li> </ul> </li>

Motivation (revisited)</a></h3> hints → deviations where to search? b quark sector</strong> (via b factories)</li> what to search? polarization</strong></li> </ul> </li>

Ateneo theory